BECKLEY— What backs America’s money? Debt. The value of the dollars you earn from your production (nationally GDP) in your pocket are backed by America’s ability to print more money. The following chart shows this:
As the above chart demonstrates, our dollars are not tied to anything of value. The value of our dollars are backed by debt. They are not tied to our income, our assets, or anything like this. We are in a spiral that cannot be recovered from without changing the system in which we work. The surprising thing from the above chart is that we are now in a place where the more money that we print the less our productivity will be. The less we produce the less we can pay back our debt. In other words, we are printing money to service the printed money robbing productivity. For every dollar of debt we take out we are now losing productivity. Back in the 60′s each dollar of debt bought nearly a dollar of productivity this is now no longer the case. The declining productivity coupled with increasing debt have caused us to become debt saturated. We’ve entered a point where we are saturated with debt.
A look at Obamacare health bill makes it clear. It is a tax bill caused to fee/tax those younger to pay for the older population since the older population failed to have the government safeguard their Social Security and Medicare. We are now raising taxes just to cover the interest payments on off balance sheet debt. Therefore, we are now robbing from the productivity of society to pay for the debt. We are now at a spot where we can no longer repay our debt with our income.
As they say, “We haven’t seen anything yet.” From here on debt will sky rocket. First, the 1 trillion dollar price tag on Obamacare is only for six years of benefits even though it is a 10 year plan. Obama decided to collect money 4 years before they start offering benefits (i.e. his “front loading the plan”). So, add in the benefits for the full 10 years and the cost gets closer to 1 and 1/2 trillion. Next is the doc fix. Clinton cut payments to docs in Medicare but politicians haven’t allowed it; Obamacare fixes this by fixing the payment cuts in Medicare which is not part of the “cost” of the legislation advertised. This gets the bill closer to a true cost of 2 trillion. Wait did I say, “True”? Yes, what is a “true” cost? Well, let’s look at similar health care legislation like Medicare it’s original cost estimates were about 9 billion. They missed that factor by a little over 10 (at 120 billion in cost). So, conservatively one could say that Obamacare will probably cost closer to 20 trillion.
Thankfully, some programs of Obamacare’s long-term, in home care are front loaded creating a “trust” fund for payment of those moneys. So, that the government can charge “premiums” (i.e. taxes) for this benefit and then spend that money to service todays debt payments. This way they can hide larger amounts of debt off the balance sheet by creating more unfunded liability accounts.
This is the worst thing that we could possibly do. In 2008 it was bad enough when it took $5 dollars in debt to increase productivity by $1. Bush’s TARP sent us over the edge as we took out debt to cover debt basically kiting a giant check to the future administration (Obama). If Bush hadn’t done that perhaps the whole system would have crashed much worse. It should have crashed because now Obama is spending trillions more from ARRA to produce, according to CNBC, worse returns:
Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast GDP, which measures total goods and services output within U.S. borders, growing at a 5.9 percent rate in the October-December period. GDP increased at a 2.2 percent pace in the third quarter.
In other words, Obama’s spending is projected (if he can maintain this growth) to return about $286 billion in GDP growth (2.2% times 13 trillion) while he is projecting deficits of over $1 trillion.
Personally, I don’t buy the GDP numbers so it’s probably much worse. I still think inflation is around the corner. We’ve been spared by the troubles in Europe for now but those issues will resolve before we resolve our issues. In fact since January of 2009 to currently the Dollar to Euro value has changed very lightly. My Merk Hard Currency Fund has remained almost flat even for the year. This I think is pretty telling. The dollar is hanging on the balance.
The government is stuck though. They’ve guaranteed and done so much that any little changes to interest rates which they WILL have to change will cause an EXPLOSION in the $450 trillion derivatives market calling in trillions in government guarantees and more. They are stuck bailing out from here on out. Our economy will not recover fully on the current system. There is to much debt, the government cannot control inflation because it can’t risk a major depression by raising interest rates, they cannot raise taxes fast enough to pay for debt without killing production, and they have guaranteed to much. The states and municipality across the country aren’t any better. It is a matter of time only. It will happen very fast. As before, I predicted that we would see a recovery in 2009/2010, but we would not see a recovery in hiring and that we would see inflation in 2011. I still predict this.
Obama’s support of Yellen into the Federal Reserve Board who has stated that she would set interest rates negative if she could is further proof that we’re going to get hammered with inflation. Our money is worthless we just haven’t realized it.
The Liar-in-Chief is on the campaign trail again trying to obfuscate the truth behind his claims that the health care reform bill will actually save money. You have clearly demonstrated that the opposite will be the eventual outcome of his destructive economic policies, but we have to keep in mind that his goal is the destruction of our economy in order to replace it with his version of a socialist utopia.
At this point, I see no way to stop him and the destructive 1960′s radicals he has integrated into government.
We truly are on a slipper fiscal slope. The only reason, IMHO, we are not seeing far greater inflation right now is that the banks are holding onto all the bailout funds.
Also, with the Euro being in the shape it is in has in my opinion probably held things off a little bit. But the Euro is stabilized and in better shape then our economy as a whole.
On this issue of inflation, I’ve noticed a few articles in recent weeks where libs and moderates are trotting out this argument that inflation rates of 4-5% aren’t bad things… We’re reliving the 1960′s. The inflationists took charge then in the midst of massive entitlement expansion and we got the 1970′s as a result. The difference is we head into this decade of inflation in much worse shape economically.
Stephen,
I could not agree more. Inflation is nothing more than the market value of money – which is driven by supply. The banks are holding it somewhat at bay right now by not being overly generous with their lending practices.
Granted deflation isn’t a good thing either but inflation being “not bad” is crazy. Inflation is the cheapening of money as Chuck points out – “driven by supply”. The greater inflation the weaker our dollar gets in relationship to the world. We have for decades greatly benefited from Bretton Woods system even though we greatly deceived the world at those meetings by going off the gold standard and then by not managing our debt as we promised.
As for banks holding onto the debt I agree the velocity of money is ridiculous. It’s just going around in circles covering itself at this time. The government is auctioning debt to pay for debt. Banks can take out loans for cheaper because of the low interest rates to cover bad loans. The debt is just going to cover debt that’s the reason why the more debt we take out we lose productivity. When debt was lower it actually went to artificially increase productivity. Now it’s just going to cover past debt, we’ve pretty much crossed the breaking point at this time. Unless we elect people this November on platforms of drastic cuts in spending (at least half if not more of the current governments spending), re-writing the tax code, and other dramatic changes then we are in deep trouble. As I’ve mentioned previously, I don’t think these coming elections will change anything but it’s worth one last try.
FT: Your whole last comment reminds me of Enron or Seneca frauds. The US government and everyone else is all circulating shit assets and liabilities.
I guess we should be thankful that we leave China holding the bill, right?
You write a good prescription for the economy’s ills FT, but in its own way it is just as radical as the whole concept of “health care reform” and unfortunately will be faced with far more opposition from our corrupt and spendthrift political class. If the upcoming election shows any movement toward fiscal sanity I would find reason for some optimism. It is the edge of the cliff, for sure.
BMM, I am skeptical that China will wind up “holding the bill”. They are far too organized and perceptive to fall into that trap and I am sure they prepared contingency plans far in advance – none of which would prove to our advantage.
China holds massive amounts of landmass throughout South America and Africa. They will control resources in the future.
However, with all of that said, I think there were numerous financial experts that completely missed the housing bubble and I know the Chinese got stuck with numerous turds from Lehman. If you google stories surrounding their collapse you can read about it.
I do agree that ultimately they have a contingency plan. But they still hold shit assets for the time being and if they started trying to unload them real quick, well they aren’t going to get much due to market glut and our gradually worsening condition. Smartest thing they could do as a country is not buy anymore and make a concerted long-term plan to sell out of US debt
[...] dollar with massive printing presses printing off worthless insolvent bills backed by nothing but declining productivity. We’re basically just check kiting and yet we have the nerve to call China a [...]