ATLANTA— Commodity prices are on the rise, the rate of job losses (while still high) is declining, consumer confidence is rebounding, the stock market is recovering: all of these are indicators that we may well be seeing the first green shoots of economic recovery from what was easily the worst recession in at least 25 years. But moving simultaneously with this narrative of recovery is a narrative of bureaucratic incompetence, in which the government is having difficulty getting the “stimulus” relief out into the broader economy. See the article below from the New York Times.
One of the major complaints about the stimulus package all along was that most of the spending was timed for late 2009 and 2010 anyway. But more than a little of it was already intended to be out there. My concern, though, is not the speed of the stimulus spending, but the larger question of whether it is needed at all? The economic recession is clearly bottoming out- and it is doing so without the direct effect of the massive, bloated government spending package Barack Obama frightened America into accepting back in February.
I still fear this stimulus spending is a frightful waste of taxpayer dollars. I think it is a disaster in waiting (and it is already being used as a tool of coercion by an increasingly brutish administration). Watch out for big-time inflation and big-time increases in interest rates in the upcoming several years, along with the threat of another economic contraction occurring much sooner than we think.
Stimulus Aid Trickles Out, but States Seek Quicker Relief
By MICHAEL COOPER
Published: May 12, 2009
Nearly three months after President Obama approved a $787 billion economic stimulus package, intended to create or save jobs, the federal government has paid out less than 6 percent of the money, largely in the form of social service payments to states.Although administration officials say the program is right on schedule, they have actually spent relatively little so far.
The stimulus bill has directly injected around $45.6 billion into the economy, mostly to help states cover the costs of Medicaid and unemployment benefits, one-time $250 checks that were mailed to Social Security recipients last week, and income tax cuts that began to take effect this spring.
Although states around the country are beginning roadwork projects, the Department of Transportation had spent only about $11 million on highway projects through the first week of May.
The intent of the stimulus program was to pump money into the economy quickly, and many members of Congress said at the time of its passage that speed was of the essence. But the huge program has been a challenge to administer for both a new administration and for states and local governments grappling with their own fiscal problems.
Some states and cities are beginning to complain that the money has yet to reach them. Others have been slow to get their paperwork to Washington; Virginia has yet to send the Transportation Department its list of road projects.
At the same time, some economists have questioned the administration’s claims that the bill has saved or created 150,000 jobs.
Obama administration officials, however, say the pace of the stimulus program is on schedule, and even if the federal checks are not yet in the mail the effects of the stimulus are beginning to reverberate: the promise of the federal money has been enough to get states to start construction work and to retain some jobs that were in jeopardy.
Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who writes in a report on the stimulus bill to be released this week that it remains “ahead of schedule in most programs,” said in a telephone interview Tuesday that the bill was helping people grapple with the recession, getting money to the states and into the economy, and laying a foundation for long-term aspirations like high-speed rail.
“We’re 85 days into a two-year program here — we’re trying to get the money out as quickly as we can, but not too quickly, so we don’t end up really screwing up here,” Mr. Biden said. “Because we’re talking about big dollars here, these are big numbers, this is unprecedented. And in 85 days we’ve gotten tens of billions of dollars out the door, and so far — knock on wood — no real big problems, no real big glitches.”
The Transportation Department has committed to pay for more than $10.5 billion worth of projects across the country, which an official there likened to signing the paperwork for a new car before the check has cleared.
Those commitments have spurred at least 20 states to award contracts and begin paying road crews; some contractors are staffing up, or postponing layoffs, in the hopes of winning some of that work.
And the federal I.O.U.’s — the government has made $88 billion worth of commitments so far — have saved jobs in many areas.
Columbus, Ohio, which sent layoff notices to its entire class of 26 police recruits in January, decided to rehire the class in February when it learned it would get a Justice Department grant.
Alabama plans to keep 3,800 teachers whose jobs were in jeopardy, knowing that education stimulus money will soon be on its way.
Utah is planning to rehire or retain about 45 probation and parole agents, court clerks, crime lab technicians, investigators and counselors on the promise of expected stimulus aid.
Nonetheless, to the frustration of some local governments, the federal spigot has been more trickle than flood, and states are facing such fiscal pressure that many are cutting jobs anyway.
When the Senate recently held a hearing on the spending of the stimulus money, Ray Scheppach, the executive director of the National Governors Association, told lawmakers that “to one extent this hearing is premature.” He reminded them that most of the stimulus funds “remain in the hands of the federal government.”
When the bill was still in Congress, the need for speed was so important that the Obama administration agreed to funnel much of the money through existing programs to accelerate the process. The bill’s Republican opponents questioned the bill’s short-term effects, seizing on a Congressional Budget Office report that found that much of the spending would be pushed into later years.
Now, a federal government that has often been caricatured as profligate has begun trying to spend money as quickly as possible and has become fixated, to use the new Washington catch phrase, with “getting money out the door.”
The Obama administration has committed to spending 70 percent of the money, or $550.9 billion, within the first two years. By that benchmark, an administration official said, the government is 8 percent toward its goal.
There has been skepticism of the administration’s claim of creating or saving 150,000 jobs. While it can be difficult to count jobs that were saved, as opposed to those that were created, Peter Morici, an economist at the University of Maryland, said that trends in state and local government employment “just do not support that claim.” Other economists have been more supportive of the administration.
Mr. Biden said the stimulus had created some public works jobs, generated work at factories that expect to benefit from the work and kept many state and local governments from laying off workers, since stimulus aid will help them balance their budgets.
But getting the money out can be a cumbersome process at times. Virginia, the last state to submit a list of transportation projects, is trying to get the work done as its Transportation Department is shedding 1,000 positions. Jeffrey Caldwell, a State Transportation Department spokesman, said that the agency had sought bids on some of the jobs anyway, so work could begin quickly when the list was done.
Last week, the government reported spending more than $10 billion in stimulus money, and officials said that the speed would increase as the program grows.
“In baseball terms, I think there’s going to be real pace on the ball here,” Mr. Biden said in the interview. “I think that what you’re going to see happen here is the velocity of this will increase not just arithmetically, but geometrically here. At least, we’ve got to make that happen.”
I don’t buy this yet! Although of course I agree with the wasteful stimulus money. Several reasons I don’t buy the recovery yet are as follows:
– Still bad retail sales (although I think this is good,
kind of like spitting in the face of the “stimulus”
funds).
– If you trend out the decline in job loss declines it is
many months still until it flat lines.
– The government is hiring affecting jobless
claims. Do not count government jobs
they don’t create value.
– Also, it seems like the job less claim decline
report was a little premature according to the
latest news:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/30741524
The average recession lasts 16 months. The private sector is already sorting itself out- before any of Obama’s stimulus money has gone into effect.
It wasn’t necessary to stimulate the economy. It was necessary for him to attain his goal of substantially increasing the scope of the federal government.
kolchak33 – Thanks for dropping by. Well put. Couldn’t agree more!
It’s frightening the way Obama is already using it to bully California on their budgetary decisions. I say kudos to Mark Sanford of South Carolina and others who have seen this for what it is, a massive overreach by the federal government.
The states created the federal government, we have to remember- not the other way around. Looked at that way, the wording of the constitution and its many limits on federal power make a whole lot more sense.
FT: I should clarify what I mean by economic recovery. I definitely do not think we’re going to rocket back like we did in 2002, 2003. I think it is going to be a painfully slow crawl like the early 1990′s or the early 1980′s. I also think the recovery is going to take a hit in about a year or two, once the full impact of this massive deficit spending is felt in the economy through higher interest rates and inflation. I think I’ve said this before, but I think we’re returning to the 1970′s, when there were off-and-on contractions throughout the decade, fueled largely by massive government intervention programs that failed.
That said, I do think we’re nearing the bottom. I can see it at my clients. Everyone is telling me their seeing sales drops stabilize. Recovery (whatever that may mean) starts once you hit bottom.
Anyway- these have been my thoughts for a while. I never thought this was going to be an “unending” recessionary nightmare- I thought that was political fodder fed to us to give political cover for all these government bailouts and programs.
You may agree with me, but thought I’d clarify for other readers.
[...] 10, 2009 by Stephen VanNuys ATLANTA – As we have been saying on the Missive for weeks, the economic recovery is already beginning – and without the help of the stimulus package. [...]