Why Barack Obama’s Economic Policies Will Likely Fail

 

ATLANTA— Just came across this video while reading another blog called American Socialism for the Rich, a site set up to discuss the more discouraging aspects of America’s series of bailouts.

In the above video, Jim Rodgers, an internationally renowned investor, states in very simple terms my entire view of this economic crisis and how the government should have addressed it. 

I was stunned as I watched him speak, because he expressed the same exact viewpoints we have been expressing on this blog since we started last August.  Basically, the government should be letting the big companies and banks fail.  Sure- it would be miserable in the short-term.  But as Mr. Rodgers expresses so clearly above, it would be better in the long-term: we would get through this crisis more quickly.

The way George Bush and Barack Obama both have attacked this crisis I am convinced will lead to extended misery for us down the road, just like similar policies have played out for Japan.  I am afraid these bailouts of individuals and corporations will only encourage more foolish behavior in the future.  Further, I strongly believe big-time inflation is only just around the corner

Mr. Rodgers makes an excellent link between Alan Greenspan bailing out Long-Term Capital Management in the late 1990′s and the crisis we face today.   LTCM was a major hedge fund started by two Ivy League educated economists that dabbled in risky derivatives trading.  Their fund quickly became overly complex and overly leveraged.  When it faced collapse in 1998, the Federal Reserve made steps to perserve it and make the collapse less disruptive to the markets.  It seemed liked a brilliant move at the time.  But it taught the markets that if you take on too much risk, the government will be there to support you should you fail.  Mr. Rodgers states this mentality fueled the excesses of this decade.

If you believe the current crisis is a result of deregulation, then this story and Mr. Rodgers talk above should give you pause.  The most heavily regulated industry in America, the banking industry, is at the forefront of our crisis.   I will continue to believe that it was the implicit backing of government moreso than ”deregulation” that helped spur the excesses of this decade.

And I believe the more libertarian method of addressing this crisis, with limited or no government involvement, would be better for our financial health in the long-term.  I am afraid Mr. Obama’s stimulus package, his mortgage bailout, and his forthcoming bank plan will all be disastrous failures, just like every other economic policy the government has tried over the last year.   Let’s hope I am wrong!

About these ads

About Stephen VanNuys
Stephen Van Nuys is a happily married CPA who works for a large accounting firm and resides in Atlanta, Georgia. He is a Christian and an avid follower of politics and current events. He is also a big-time baseball fan. Stephen and his wife are runners, having completed multiple 10k’s and half-marathons between them. They place importance on being environmentally conscious and actively serving others through their church and other outlets. Mr. Van Nuys’ political leanings are socially conservative and economically libertarian. He may express his perspectives on current events strongly, but he welcomes disagreement, particularly where others believe his missives to be ill-informed or just plain wrong! He enjoys good debate and discussion and is writing here as much to express his perspectives as he is to learn about others.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers

%d bloggers like this: